- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- E3 vs 3DWOX 2X
Raise3D E3 vs Sindoh 3DWOX 2X
What E3 does better (4) and where 3DWOX 2X wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E33DWOX 2X
| E3 | 3DWOX 2X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 487 mm | 573 mm | −86 mm |
| Width | 614 mm | 490 mm | +124 mm |
| Depth | 597 mm | 466 mm | +131 mm |
| Weight | 33.3 kg | 31 kg | +2.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E3 better than 3DWOX 2X?
- Build volume19 L vs 13.7 L+39%
- Number of supported materials6 vs 32×
- Build width (X)330 mm vs 228 mm+45%
- Build depth (Y)240 mm vs 200 mm+20%
Why is 3DWOX 2X better than E3?
- Build height (Z)240 mm vs 300 mm+25%
- Weight33.3 kg vs 31 kg+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | — | Bed-slinger (i3-style) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 330 mm | 228 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 240 mm | 200 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 240 mm | 300 mm |
| Build volume | 19 L | 13.7 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 200 mm/s | — |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | — | 0.05 mm |
| Thickest layer height | — | 0.4 mm |
| Automatic bed levelling | — | Yes |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | 330 °C | — |
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS, ASA, PETG, PVA, TPU | PLA, ABS, Flexible |
| Number of supported materials | 6 | 3 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | — |
| Max bed temperature | 110 °C | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | No | — |
| Bluetooth | No | — |
| Screen size | — | 5″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 614 mm | 490 mm |
| Depth | 597 mm | 466 mm |
| Height | 487 mm | 573 mm |
| Weight | 33.3 kg | 31 kg |
