- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Ender-3 S1 Pro vs 3DWOX 2X
Creality Ender-3 S1 Pro vs Sindoh 3DWOX 2X
What Ender-3 S1 Pro does better (2) and where 3DWOX 2X wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Build volume6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Ender-3 S1 Pro3DWOX 2X
| Ender-3 S1 Pro | 3DWOX 2X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 625 mm | 573 mm | +52 mm |
| Width | 490 mm | 490 mm | = |
| Depth | 455 mm | 466 mm | −11 mm |
| Weight | 8.6 kg | 31 kg | −22.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ender-3 S1 Pro better than 3DWOX 2X?
- Weight8.6 kg vs 31 kg3.6×
- Build depth (Y)220 mm vs 200 mm+10%
Why is 3DWOX 2X better than Ender-3 S1 Pro?
- Wi-FiNo · Ender-3 S1 Pro: Yes
- Build volume13.1 L vs 13.7 L+5%
- Number of supported materials1 vs 33×
- EthernetNo · Ender-3 S1 Pro: Yes
- Build height (Z)270 mm vs 300 mm+11%
- Build width (X)220 mm vs 228 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | — | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | — | Bed-slinger (i3-style) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 220 mm | 228 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 220 mm | 200 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 270 mm | 300 mm |
| Build volume | 13.1 L | 13.7 L |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | — | 0.05 mm |
| Thickest layer height | — | 0.4 mm |
| Automatic bed levelling | — | Yes |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | — | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | TPU | PLA, ABS, Flexible |
| Number of supported materials | 1 | 3 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB, SD card | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | No | — |
| Screen size | — | 5″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 490 mm | 490 mm |
| Depth | 455 mm | 466 mm |
| Height | 625 mm | 573 mm |
| Weight | 8.6 kg | 31 kg |
| Rated power | 350 W | — |
