- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- E3 vs ZR
Raise3D E3 vs WonderMaker ZR
What E3 does better (4) and where ZR wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E3ZR
| E3 | ZR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 487 mm | 520 mm | −33 mm |
| Width | 614 mm | 450 mm | +164 mm |
| Depth | 597 mm | 450 mm | +147 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E3 better than ZR?
- Max nozzle temperature330 °C vs 300 °C+10%
- EthernetYes · ZR: No
- Number of supported materials6 vs 4+50%
- Build width (X)330 mm vs 300 mm+10%
Why is ZR better than E3?
- Build volume19 L vs 27 L+42%
- Max print speed200 mm/s vs 300 mm/s+50%
- Build height (Z)240 mm vs 300 mm+25%
- Build depth (Y)240 mm vs 300 mm+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 330 mm | 300 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 240 mm | 300 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 240 mm | 300 mm |
| Build volume | 19 L | 27 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 200 mm/s | 300 mm/s |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | 330 °C | 300 °C |
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | — |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS, ASA, PETG, PVA, TPU | PVA, PETG, PLA, TPU |
| Number of supported materials | 6 | 4 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | Yes |
| Max bed temperature | 110 °C | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB | Wi-Fi |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| SD card | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 614 mm | 450 mm |
| Depth | 597 mm | 450 mm |
| Height | 487 mm | 520 mm |
| Weight | 33.3 kg | — |
