- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Kobra 4 vs E3
Anycubic Kobra 4 vs Raise3D E3
What Kobra 4 does better (4) and where E3 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Kobra 4E3
| Kobra 4 | E3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 461 mm | 487 mm | −26 mm |
| Width | 455 mm | 614 mm | −159 mm |
| Depth | 445 mm | 597 mm | −152 mm |
| Weight | 9.9 kg | 33.3 kg | −23.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Kobra 4 better than E3?
- Max print speed600 mm/s vs 200 mm/s3×
- Weight9.9 kg vs 33.3 kg3.4×
- Build height (Z)260 mm vs 240 mm+8%
- Build depth (Y)260 mm vs 240 mm+8%
Why is E3 better than Kobra 4?
- Build volume17.6 L vs 19 L+8%
- Max nozzle temperature300 °C vs 330 °C+10%
- Number of supported materials3 vs 62×
- Max bed temperature100 °C vs 110 °C+10%
- Build width (X)260 mm vs 330 mm+27%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 260 mm | 330 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 260 mm | 240 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 260 mm | 240 mm |
| Build volume | 17.6 L | 19 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 600 mm/s | 200 mm/s |
| Print quality | ||
| Automatic bed levelling | Yes | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | 300 °C | 330 °C |
| Default nozzle | — | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | — | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, PETG, TPU | PLA, ABS, ASA, PETG, PVA, TPU |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | 6 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | Yes |
| Max bed temperature | 100 °C | 110 °C |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | — | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | Yes |
| USB | — | Yes |
| SD card | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 455 mm | 614 mm |
| Depth | 445 mm | 597 mm |
| Height | 461 mm | 487 mm |
| Weight | 9.9 kg | 33.3 kg |
