- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- CR-30 Printmill Belt vs 3DWOX 2X
Creality CR-30 Printmill Belt vs Sindoh 3DWOX 2X
What CR-30 Printmill Belt does better (1) and where 3DWOX 2X wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
CR-30 Printmill Belt3DWOX 2X
| CR-30 Printmill Belt | 3DWOX 2X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 410 mm | 573 mm | −163 mm |
| Width | 535 mm | 490 mm | +45 mm |
| Depth | 656 mm | 466 mm | +190 mm |
| Weight | 16.5 kg | 31 kg | −14.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is CR-30 Printmill Belt better than 3DWOX 2X?
- Weight16.5 kg vs 31 kg+88%
Why is 3DWOX 2X better than CR-30 Printmill Belt?
- Wi-FiNo · CR-30 Printmill Belt: Yes
- EthernetNo · CR-30 Printmill Belt: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | — | Bed-slinger (i3-style) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | — | 228 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | — | 200 mm |
| Build height (Z) | — | 300 mm |
| Build volume | — | 13.7 L |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | — | 0.05 mm |
| Thickest layer height | — | 0.4 mm |
| Automatic bed levelling | — | Yes |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, TPU, PETG | PLA, ABS, Flexible |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | 3 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB, SD card | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | No | — |
| Screen size | — | 5″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 535 mm | 490 mm |
| Depth | 656 mm | 466 mm |
| Height | 410 mm | 573 mm |
| Weight | 16.5 kg | 31 kg |
| Rated power | 350 W | — |
