How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. Guider 2s vs 2.0 Modular F350

Flashforge Guider 2s vs Snapmaker 2.0 Modular F350

What Guider 2s does better (1) and where 2.0 Modular F350 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Flashforge Guider 2s
Flashforge · 2021Guider 2s
7.2Score
1 advantage≈ $1,000
Higher score
vs
Snapmaker 2.0 Modular F350
Snapmaker · 20212.0 Modular F350
4 advantages≈ $1,650
7.9Build volume9.3

Why is Guider 2s better than 2.0 Modular F350?

  1. EthernetYes · 2.0 Modular F350: No

Why is 2.0 Modular F350 better than Guider 2s?

  1. Build volume21 L vs 37 L+76%
  2. Build height (Z)300 mm vs 330 mm+10%
  3. Build depth (Y)250 mm vs 350 mm+40%
  4. Build width (X)280 mm vs 320 mm+14%
Specifications

Side by side

General
TechnologyFDM / FFF (filament)—
Delivered asFully assembled—
Build volume
Build width (X)280 mm320 mm
Build depth (Y)250 mm350 mm
Build height (Z)300 mm330 mm
Build volume21 L37 L
Speed
Max print speed100 mm/s—
Print quality
Finest layer height0.1 mm—
Thickest layer height0.4 mm—
Extruder & hotend
Max nozzle temperature300 °C—
Default nozzle0.4 mm0.4 mm
Filament diameter1.75 mm—
Print bed
Heated bedYes—
Max bed temperature120 °C—
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityWi-Fi, Ethernet, USBWi-Fi, USB
Wi-FiYesYes
EthernetYesNo
USBYesYes
SD card—No
Bluetooth—No
Touchscreen—Yes
Features
Built-in cameraYes—
Filament runout sensorYes—
Power-loss recoveryYes—
Size & power
Width550 mm—
Depth490 mm—
Height560 mm—
Weight30 kg—
Rated power—320 W
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare