- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- T-REX vs Guider 2s
Bresser T-REX vs Flashforge Guider 2s
What T-REX does better (1) and where Guider 2s wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
T-REXGuider 2s
| T-REX | Guider 2s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 500 mm | 560 mm | −60 mm |
| Width | 560 mm | 550 mm | +10 mm |
| Depth | 415 mm | 490 mm | −75 mm |
| Weight | 14.8 kg | 30 kg | −15.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is T-REX better than Guider 2s?
- Weight14.8 kg vs 30 kg2×
Why is Guider 2s better than T-REX?
- Build volume5 L vs 21 L4.2×
- Build height (Z)150 mm vs 300 mm2×
- EthernetNo · T-REX: Yes
- Build depth (Y)148 mm vs 250 mm+69%
- Build width (X)227 mm vs 280 mm+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Delivered as | — | Fully assembled |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 227 mm | 280 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 148 mm | 250 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 150 mm | 300 mm |
| Build volume | 5 L | 21 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | — | 100 mm/s |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | — | 0.1 mm |
| Thickest layer height | — | 0.4 mm |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | — | 300 °C |
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS | — |
| Number of supported materials | 2 | — |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | — |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | Yes |
| Max bed temperature | — | 120 °C |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB, SD card | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | No | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | — | Yes |
| Filament runout sensor | — | Yes |
| Power-loss recovery | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 560 mm | 550 mm |
| Depth | 415 mm | 490 mm |
| Height | 500 mm | 560 mm |
| Weight | 14.8 kg | 30 kg |
