- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- T-REX vs mCreate 2.0
Bresser T-REX vs Makeblock mCreate 2.0
What T-REX does better (1) and where mCreate 2.0 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.6Build volume6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
T-REXmCreate 2.0
| T-REX | mCreate 2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 500 mm | 485 mm | +15 mm |
| Width | 560 mm | 445 mm | +115 mm |
| Depth | 415 mm | 550 mm | −135 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is T-REX better than mCreate 2.0?
- Build width (X)227 mm vs 220 mm+3%
Why is mCreate 2.0 better than T-REX?
- Build volume5 L vs 14.3 L2.9×
- Build height (Z)150 mm vs 295 mm+97%
- Number of supported materials2 vs 3+50%
- Build depth (Y)148 mm vs 220 mm+49%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 227 mm | 220 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 148 mm | 220 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 150 mm | 295 mm |
| Build volume | 5 L | 14.3 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | — | 150 mm/s |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS | PLA, TPU, PVA |
| Number of supported materials | 2 | 3 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB, SD card | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Ethernet | No | — |
| USB | Yes | — |
| SD card | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | No | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 560 mm | 445 mm |
| Depth | 415 mm | 550 mm |
| Height | 500 mm | 485 mm |
| Weight | 14.8 kg | — |
