- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- B1 vs T-REX
BIQU B1 vs Bresser T-REX
What B1 does better (5) and where T-REX wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is B1 better than T-REX?
- Build volume14.9 L vs 5 L3×
- Build height (Z)270 mm vs 150 mm+80%
- Build depth (Y)235 mm vs 148 mm+59%
- Number of supported materials3 vs 2+50%
- Build width (X)235 mm vs 227 mm+4%
Why is T-REX better than B1?
T-REX has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 235 mm | 227 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 235 mm | 148 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 270 mm | 150 mm |
| Build volume | 14.9 L | 5 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 100 mm/s | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | — | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS, PETG | PLA, ABS |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | 2 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | — | Wi-Fi, USB, SD card |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | No |
| USB | — | Yes |
| SD card | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 560 mm |
| Depth | — | 415 mm |
| Height | — | 500 mm |
| Weight | — | 14.8 kg |
