- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- B1 vs Ender 3 V2
BIQU B1 vs Creality Ender 3 V2
What B1 does better (5) and where Ender 3 V2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
3.2Speed4.9
6.6Build volume4.5
Why is B1 better than Ender 3 V2?
- Build volume14.9 L vs 12.1 L+23%
- TouchscreenYes · Ender 3 V2: No
- Build height (Z)270 mm vs 250 mm+8%
- Build width (X)235 mm vs 220 mm+7%
- Build depth (Y)235 mm vs 220 mm+7%
Why is Ender 3 V2 better than B1?
- Max print speed100 mm/s vs 180 mm/s+80%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | — | Bed-slinger (i3-style) |
| Delivered as | — | Kit |
| All-metal frame | — | Yes |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 235 mm | 220 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 235 mm | 220 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 270 mm | 250 mm |
| Build volume | 14.9 L | 12.1 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 100 mm/s | 180 mm/s |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | — | 0.1 mm |
| Thickest layer height | — | 0.4 mm |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | — | 255 °C |
| Direct-drive extruder | — | No |
| Default nozzle | — | 0.4 mm |
| Nozzle material | — | brass |
| Swappable nozzle / hotend | — | Yes |
| Toolheads | — | 1 |
| Nozzles | — | 1 |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS, PETG | PETG, PLA, TPU |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | 3 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | Yes |
| Max bed temperature | — | 110 °C |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | — | USB, SD card |
| Wi-Fi | — | No |
| Ethernet | — | No |
| USB | — | Yes |
| SD card | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Features | ||
| Silent stepper drivers | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 475 mm |
| Depth | — | 470 mm |
| Height | — | 620 mm |
| Weight | — | 7.8 kg |
| Rated power | — | 270 W |
