How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare310 models · updated Nov 12, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. T-REX vs 2.0 F250

Bresser T-REX vs Snapmaker 2.0 F250

What T-REX does better (0) and where 2.0 F250 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Bresser T-REX
Bresser · 2021T-REX
0 advantages≈ $860
vs
Snapmaker 2.0 F250
Snapmaker · 20212.0 F250
4.8Score
4 advantages≈ $1,350
Higher score
2.6Build volume5.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-REX2.0 F250
560 × 500415405 × 490424
T-REX2.0 F250Difference
Height500 mm490 mm+10 mm
Width560 mm405 mm+155 mm
Depth415 mm424 mm−9 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-REX better than 2.0 F250?

T-REX has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is 2.0 F250 better than T-REX?

  1. Build volume5 L vs 13.5 L2.7×
  2. Build height (Z)150 mm vs 235 mm+57%
  3. Number of supported materials2 vs 42×
  4. Build depth (Y)148 mm vs 250 mm+69%
Specifications

Side by side

Snapmaker 2.0 F250Snapmaker 2.0 F250≈ $1,3504.8
General
TechnologyFDM / FFF (filament)FDM / FFF (filament)
Delivered as—Kit
Build volume
Build width (X)227 mm230 mm
Build depth (Y)148 mm250 mm
Build height (Z)150 mm235 mm
Build volume5 L13.5 L
Speed
Max print speed—100 mm/s
Print quality
Finest layer height—0.05 mm
Thickest layer height—0.3 mm
Extruder & hotend
Max nozzle temperature—275 °C
Direct-drive extruder—Yes
Default nozzle0.4 mm0.4 mm
Toolheads—1
Nozzles—1
Filament diameter1.75 mm1.75 mm
Supported materialsPLA, ABSABS, PETG, PLA, TPU
Number of supported materials24
Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)NoNo
Print bed
Heated bedYesYes
Max bed temperature—80 °C
Enclosure
Enclosed build chamber—No
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityWi-Fi, USB, SD cardWi-Fi, USB
Wi-FiYesYes
EthernetNo—
USBYesYes
SD cardYes—
BluetoothNo—
Screen size—5″
TouchscreenYesYes
Features
Built-in camera—No
Size & power
Width560 mm405 mm
Depth415 mm424 mm
Height500 mm490 mm
Weight14.8 kg—
Rated power—320 W
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare