- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- T-REX vs T-REX²
Bresser T-REX vs Bresser T-REX²
What T-REX does better (2) and where T-REX² wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
T-REXT-REX²
| T-REX | T-REX² | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 500 mm | 403 mm | +97 mm |
| Width | 560 mm | 360 mm | +200 mm |
| Depth | 415 mm | 526 mm | −111 mm |
| Weight | 14.8 kg | 15 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is T-REX better than T-REX²?
- Build volume5 L vs 4.4 L+14%
- Build width (X)227 mm vs 200 mm+14%
Why is T-REX² better than T-REX?
T-REX² has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 227 mm | 200 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 148 mm | 148 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 150 mm | 150 mm |
| Build volume | 5 L | 4.4 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | — | 100 mm/s |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS | PLA, ABS |
| Number of supported materials | 2 | 2 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB, SD card | Wi-Fi, USB, SD card |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 560 mm | 360 mm |
| Depth | 415 mm | 526 mm |
| Height | 500 mm | 403 mm |
| Weight | 14.8 kg | 15 kg |
