- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- T-REX² vs 2.0 Modular F350
Bresser T-REX² vs Snapmaker 2.0 Modular F350
What T-REX² does better (0) and where 2.0 Modular F350 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.6Build volume9.4
Why is T-REX² better than 2.0 Modular F350?
T-REX² has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 2.0 Modular F350 better than T-REX²?
- Build volume4.4 L vs 37 L8.4×
- Build height (Z)150 mm vs 330 mm2.2×
- Build depth (Y)148 mm vs 350 mm2.4×
- Build width (X)200 mm vs 320 mm+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | — |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 200 mm | 320 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 148 mm | 350 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 150 mm | 330 mm |
| Build volume | 4.4 L | 37 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 100 mm/s | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | — |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS | — |
| Number of supported materials | 2 | — |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB, SD card | Wi-Fi, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 360 mm | — |
| Depth | 526 mm | — |
| Height | 403 mm | — |
| Weight | 15 kg | — |
| Rated power | — | 320 W |
