How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare310 models · updated Nov 12, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. Guider IIs V2 vs 2.0 Modular F350

Flashforge Guider IIs V2 vs Snapmaker 2.0 Modular F350

What Guider IIs V2 does better (1) and where 2.0 Modular F350 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Flashforge Guider IIs V2
Flashforge · 2021Guider IIs V2
5.5Score
1 advantage≈ $1,700
Higher score
vs
Snapmaker 2.0 Modular F350
Snapmaker · 20212.0 Modular F350
4 advantages≈ $1,650
8.1Build volume9.4

Why is Guider IIs V2 better than 2.0 Modular F350?

  1. EthernetYes · 2.0 Modular F350: No

Why is 2.0 Modular F350 better than Guider IIs V2?

  1. Build volume21 L vs 37 L+76%
  2. Build height (Z)300 mm vs 330 mm+10%
  3. Build depth (Y)250 mm vs 350 mm+40%
  4. Build width (X)280 mm vs 320 mm+14%
Specifications

Side by side

General
TechnologyFDM / FFF (filament)—
Build volume
Build width (X)280 mm320 mm
Build depth (Y)250 mm350 mm
Build height (Z)300 mm330 mm
Build volume21 L37 L
Speed
Max print speed150 mm/s—
Print quality
Finest layer height0.1 mm—
Thickest layer height0.4 mm—
Extruder & hotend
Default nozzle0.4 mm0.4 mm
Toolheads1—
Nozzles1—
Filament diameter1.75 mm—
Supported materialsABS, ASA, HIPS, PC, PET, PETG, PLA—
Number of supported materials7—
Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)Yes—
Print bed
Heated bedYes—
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityWi-Fi, USBWi-Fi, USB
Wi-FiYesYes
EthernetYesNo
USBYesYes
SD cardNoNo
BluetoothNoNo
TouchscreenYesYes
Size & power
Width549 mm—
Depth490 mm—
Height561 mm—
Weight30 kg—
Rated power—320 W
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare