How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare310 models · updated Nov 12, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. F160 vs 2.0 Modular F350

CreatBot F160 vs Snapmaker 2.0 Modular F350

What F160 does better (0) and where 2.0 Modular F350 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

CreatBot F160
CreatBot · 2020F160
6.3Score
0 advantages≈ $2,000
Higher score
vs
Snapmaker 2.0 Modular F350
Snapmaker · 20212.0 Modular F350
4 advantages≈ $1,650
2.8Build volume9.4

Why is F160 better than 2.0 Modular F350?

F160 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is 2.0 Modular F350 better than F160?

  1. Build volume5.1 L vs 37 L7.3×
  2. Build height (Z)200 mm vs 330 mm+65%
  3. Build depth (Y)160 mm vs 350 mm2.2×
  4. Build width (X)160 mm vs 320 mm2×
Specifications

Side by side

CreatBot F160CreatBot F160≈ $2,0006.3
General
TechnologyFDM / FFF (filament)—
Build volume
Build width (X)160 mm320 mm
Build depth (Y)160 mm350 mm
Build height (Z)200 mm330 mm
Build volume5.1 L37 L
Speed
Max print speed300 mm/s—
Print quality
Finest layer height0.05 mm—
Automatic bed levellingNo—
Extruder & hotend
Max nozzle temperature420 °C—
Default nozzle0.4 mm0.4 mm
Filament diameter1.75 mm—
Print bed
Heated bedYes—
Max bed temperature150 °C—
Enclosure
Actively heated chamberYes—
Max chamber temperature70 °C—
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityUSBWi-Fi, USB
Wi-Fi—Yes
Ethernet—No
USBYesYes
SD card—No
Bluetooth—No
Screen size4.3″—
TouchscreenYesYes
Features
Filament runout sensorYes—
Power-loss recoveryYes—
Size & power
Width370 mm—
Depth320 mm—
Height490 mm—
Weight18 kg—
Rated power1,100 W320 W
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare