- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- 3DWOX 2X vs X3
Sindoh 3DWOX 2X vs Zaxe X3
What 3DWOX 2X does better (3) and where X3 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
3DWOX 2XX3
| 3DWOX 2X | X3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 573 mm | 530 mm | +43 mm |
| Width | 490 mm | 410 mm | +80 mm |
| Depth | 466 mm | 583 mm | −117 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 3DWOX 2X better than X3?
- Build volume13.7 L vs 12.7 L+8%
- Build height (Z)300 mm vs 250 mm+20%
- Build width (X)228 mm vs 220 mm+4%
Why is X3 better than 3DWOX 2X?
- Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)No · 3DWOX 2X: Yes
- Number of supported materials3 vs 5+67%
- Build depth (Y)200 mm vs 230 mm+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | — |
| Motion system | Bed-slinger (i3-style) | — |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 228 mm | 220 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 200 mm | 230 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 300 mm | 250 mm |
| Build volume | 13.7 L | 12.7 L |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.05 mm | — |
| Thickest layer height | 0.4 mm | — |
| Automatic bed levelling | Yes | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | — |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS, Flexible | PLA, ABS, PETG, Nylon, Wood |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | 5 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | Yes |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | No |
| Screen size | 5″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 490 mm | 410 mm |
| Depth | 466 mm | 583 mm |
| Height | 573 mm | 530 mm |
| Weight | 31 kg | — |
