- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- 3DWOX 2X vs 2040 Pro
Sindoh 3DWOX 2X vs WASP 2040 Pro
What 3DWOX 2X does better (0) and where 2040 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
3DWOX 2X2040 Pro
| 3DWOX 2X | 2040 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 573 mm | 870 mm | −297 mm |
| Width | 490 mm | 490 mm | = |
| Depth | 466 mm | 440 mm | +26 mm |
| Weight | 31 kg | 25 kg | +6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 3DWOX 2X better than 2040 Pro?
3DWOX 2X has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 2040 Pro better than 3DWOX 2X?
- Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)No · 3DWOX 2X: Yes
- Number of supported materials3 vs 4+33%
- Weight31 kg vs 25 kg+24%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | Bed-slinger (i3-style) | Delta |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 228 mm | — |
| Build depth (Y) | 200 mm | — |
| Build height (Z) | 300 mm | — |
| Build volume | 13.7 L | — |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | — | 500 mm/s |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.05 mm | 0.05 mm |
| Thickest layer height | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Automatic bed levelling | Yes | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | — | 350 °C |
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Nozzle material | — | hardened steel |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS, Flexible | PLA, PETG, ABS, PA carbon |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | 4 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | Yes |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB | SD card |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Ethernet | Yes | — |
| USB | Yes | — |
| SD card | — | Yes |
| Screen size | 5″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 490 mm | 490 mm |
| Depth | 466 mm | 440 mm |
| Height | 573 mm | 870 mm |
| Weight | 31 kg | 25 kg |
| Rated power | — | 600 W |
