- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- 3DWOX 2X vs X5
Sindoh 3DWOX 2X vs Tiertime X5
What 3DWOX 2X does better (4) and where X5 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
3DWOX 2XX5
| 3DWOX 2X | X5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 573 mm | 520 mm | +53 mm |
| Width | 490 mm | 850 mm | −360 mm |
| Depth | 466 mm | 625 mm | −159 mm |
| Weight | 31 kg | 52 kg | −21 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 3DWOX 2X better than X5?
- Build volume13.7 L vs 8.3 L+65%
- Build height (Z)300 mm vs 200 mm+50%
- Weight31 kg vs 52 kg+68%
- Build width (X)228 mm vs 180 mm+27%
Why is X5 better than 3DWOX 2X?
- Screen size5″ vs 7″+40%
- Build depth (Y)200 mm vs 230 mm+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | Bed-slinger (i3-style) | — |
| Delivered as | — | Fully assembled |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 228 mm | 180 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 200 mm | 230 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 300 mm | 200 mm |
| Build volume | 13.7 L | 8.3 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | — | 200 mm/s |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.05 mm | 0.05 mm |
| Thickest layer height | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Automatic bed levelling | Yes | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | — | 299 °C |
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.5 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS, Flexible | — |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | — |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Screen size | 5″ | 7″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 490 mm | 850 mm |
| Depth | 466 mm | 625 mm |
| Height | 573 mm | 520 mm |
| Weight | 31 kg | 52 kg |
