- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- 3DWOX 1X vs 3DWOX 2X
Sindoh 3DWOX 1X vs Sindoh 3DWOX 2X
What 3DWOX 1X does better (2) and where 3DWOX 2X wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
3DWOX 1X3DWOX 2X
| 3DWOX 1X | 3DWOX 2X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 573 mm | 573 mm | = |
| Width | 490 mm | 490 mm | = |
| Depth | 466 mm | 466 mm | = |
| Weight | 31 kg | 31 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 3DWOX 1X better than 3DWOX 2X?
- Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)Yes · 3DWOX 2X: No
- Number of supported materials6 vs 32×
Why is 3DWOX 2X better than 3DWOX 1X?
3DWOX 2X has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | Bed-slinger (i3-style) | Bed-slinger (i3-style) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 228 mm | 228 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 200 mm | 200 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Build volume | 13.7 L | 13.7 L |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.05 mm | 0.05 mm |
| Thickest layer height | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Automatic bed levelling | Yes | Yes |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS, ASA, PETG, PA, etc | PLA, ABS, Flexible |
| Number of supported materials | 6 | 3 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | Yes | No |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Screen size | — | 5″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 490 mm | 490 mm |
| Depth | 466 mm | 466 mm |
| Height | 573 mm | 573 mm |
| Weight | 31 kg | 31 kg |
