- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- DX vs 3DWOX 1X
CreatBot DX vs Sindoh 3DWOX 1X
What DX does better (5) and where 3DWOX 1X wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
DX3DWOX 1X
| DX | 3DWOX 1X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 570 mm | 573 mm | −3 mm |
| Width | 420 mm | 490 mm | −70 mm |
| Depth | 380 mm | 466 mm | −86 mm |
| Weight | 25 kg | 31 kg | −6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is DX better than 3DWOX 1X?
- Build volume22.5 L vs 13.7 L+64%
- Number of supported materials13 vs 62.2×
- Build width (X)300 mm vs 228 mm+32%
- Build depth (Y)250 mm vs 200 mm+25%
- Weight25 kg vs 31 kg+24%
Why is 3DWOX 1X better than DX?
3DWOX 1X has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | — | Bed-slinger (i3-style) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 300 mm | 228 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 250 mm | 200 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Build volume | 22.5 L | 13.7 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 200 mm/s | — |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.05 mm | 0.05 mm |
| Thickest layer height | — | 0.4 mm |
| Automatic bed levelling | — | Yes |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | 350 °C | — |
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS, Carbon Fiber, Wood, Nylon, PC, PTEG, HIPS, PP, Flexible, TPU, PVA, etc. | PLA, ABS, ASA, PETG, PA, etc |
| Number of supported materials | 13 | 6 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | Yes | Yes |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | — |
| Max bed temperature | 100 °C | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| Screen size | 4.3″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 420 mm | 490 mm |
| Depth | 380 mm | 466 mm |
| Height | 570 mm | 573 mm |
| Weight | 25 kg | 31 kg |
