- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- REX II WLAN vs 3DWOX 1X
Bresser REX II WLAN vs Sindoh 3DWOX 1X
What REX II WLAN does better (3) and where 3DWOX 1X wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Build volume6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
REX II WLAN3DWOX 1X
| REX II WLAN | 3DWOX 1X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 560 mm | 573 mm | −13 mm |
| Width | 550 mm | 490 mm | +60 mm |
| Depth | 490 mm | 466 mm | +24 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is REX II WLAN better than 3DWOX 1X?
- Build volume21 L vs 13.7 L+53%
- Build depth (Y)280 mm vs 200 mm+40%
- Build width (X)250 mm vs 228 mm+10%
Why is 3DWOX 1X better than REX II WLAN?
- Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)No · REX II WLAN: Yes
- Number of supported materials2 vs 63×
- EthernetNo · REX II WLAN: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Motion system | — | Bed-slinger (i3-style) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 250 mm | 228 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 280 mm | 200 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Build volume | 21 L | 13.7 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 150 mm/s | — |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | — | 0.05 mm |
| Thickest layer height | — | 0.4 mm |
| Automatic bed levelling | — | Yes |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS | PLA, ABS, ASA, PETG, PA, etc |
| Number of supported materials | 2 | 6 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | Yes |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | No | — |
| Bluetooth | No | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 550 mm | 490 mm |
| Depth | 490 mm | 466 mm |
| Height | 560 mm | 573 mm |
| Weight | — | 31 kg |
