- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- 3DP-GEMMA vs X3
Gembird 3DP-GEMMA vs Zaxe X3
What 3DP-GEMMA does better (0) and where X3 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
3DP-GEMMAX3
| 3DP-GEMMA | X3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 290 mm | 530 mm | −240 mm |
| Width | 210 mm | 410 mm | −200 mm |
| Depth | 210 mm | 583 mm | −373 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 3DP-GEMMA better than X3?
3DP-GEMMA has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is X3 better than 3DP-GEMMA?
- Build volume1.3 L vs 12.7 L9.8×
- Build height (Z)100 mm vs 250 mm2.5×
- Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)No · 3DP-GEMMA: Yes
- Wi-FiNo · 3DP-GEMMA: Yes
- Number of supported materials1 vs 55×
- Build depth (Y)110 mm vs 230 mm2.1×
- EthernetNo · 3DP-GEMMA: Yes
- Build width (X)120 mm vs 220 mm+83%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | — |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 120 mm | 220 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 110 mm | 230 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 100 mm | 250 mm |
| Build volume | 1.3 L | 12.7 L |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.1 mm | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Filament diameter | — | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA | PLA, ABS, PETG, Nylon, Wood |
| Number of supported materials | 1 | 5 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | Yes |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB, SD card | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 210 mm | 410 mm |
| Depth | 210 mm | 583 mm |
| Height | 290 mm | 530 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | — |
