How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare310 models · updated Nov 12, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. 3DP-GEMMA vs MK4

Gembird 3DP-GEMMA vs Prusa MK4

What 3DP-GEMMA does better (1) and where MK4 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Gembird 3DP-GEMMA
Gembird · 20223DP-GEMMA
3.8Score
1 advantage
Higher score
vs
Prusa MK4
Prusa · 2023MK4
7 advantages≈ $810
2.3Build volume4.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

3DP-GEMMAMK4
210 × 290210500 × 400550
3DP-GEMMAMK4Difference
Height290 mm400 mm−110 mm
Width210 mm500 mm−290 mm
Depth210 mm550 mm−340 mm
Weight3 kg7 kg−4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 3DP-GEMMA better than MK4?

  1. Weight3 kg vs 7 kg2.3×

Why is MK4 better than 3DP-GEMMA?

  1. Build volume1.3 L vs 11.6 L8.9×
  2. Build height (Z)100 mm vs 220 mm2.2×
  3. Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)No · 3DP-GEMMA: Yes
  4. Number of supported materials1 vs 66×
  5. Build width (X)120 mm vs 250 mm2.1×
  6. EthernetNo · 3DP-GEMMA: Yes
  7. Build depth (Y)110 mm vs 210 mm+91%
Specifications

Side by side

Prusa MK4Prusa MK4≈ $810
General
TechnologyFDM / FFF (filament)—
Build volume
Build width (X)120 mm250 mm
Build depth (Y)110 mm210 mm
Build height (Z)100 mm220 mm
Build volume1.3 L11.6 L
Print quality
Finest layer height0.1 mm—
Extruder & hotend
Default nozzle—0.4 mm
Filament diameter—1.75 mm
Supported materialsPLAPETG, PVA, ASA, PLA, Nylon, ABS
Number of supported materials16
Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)NoYes
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityUSB, SD cardEthernet, USB
Wi-FiNoNo
EthernetNoYes
USBYesYes
SD cardYesNo
BluetoothNoNo
Touchscreen—No
Size & power
Width210 mm500 mm
Depth210 mm550 mm
Height290 mm400 mm
Weight3 kg7 kg
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare