- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Ender 3 V2 Neo vs 3DP-GEMMA
Creality Ender 3 V2 Neo vs Gembird 3DP-GEMMA
What Ender 3 V2 Neo does better (5) and where 3DP-GEMMA wins (1) — every spec side by side.
4.1Build volume2.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Ender 3 V2 Neo3DP-GEMMA
| Ender 3 V2 Neo | 3DP-GEMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 472 mm | 290 mm | +182 mm |
| Width | 438 mm | 210 mm | +228 mm |
| Depth | 424 mm | 210 mm | +214 mm |
| Weight | 7.8 kg | 3 kg | +4.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ender 3 V2 Neo better than 3DP-GEMMA?
- Build volume12.1 L vs 1.3 L9.3×
- Build height (Z)250 mm vs 100 mm2.5×
- Number of supported materials3 vs 13×
- Build depth (Y)220 mm vs 110 mm2×
- Build width (X)220 mm vs 120 mm+83%
Why is 3DP-GEMMA better than Ender 3 V2 Neo?
- Weight7.8 kg vs 3 kg2.6×
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 220 mm | 120 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 220 mm | 110 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 250 mm | 100 mm |
| Build volume | 12.1 L | 1.3 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 120 mm/s | — |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | — | 0.1 mm |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | — |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | — |
| Supported materials | PLA, PETG, ABS | PLA |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | 1 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB, SD card | USB, SD card |
| Wi-Fi | No | No |
| Ethernet | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 438 mm | 210 mm |
| Depth | 424 mm | 210 mm |
| Height | 472 mm | 290 mm |
| Weight | 7.8 kg | 3 kg |
