- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Ender-3 S1 Pro vs Ender 3 V2 Neo
Creality Ender-3 S1 Pro vs Creality Ender 3 V2 Neo
What Ender-3 S1 Pro does better (2) and where Ender 3 V2 Neo wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Build volume4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Ender-3 S1 ProEnder 3 V2 Neo
| Ender-3 S1 Pro | Ender 3 V2 Neo | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 625 mm | 472 mm | +153 mm |
| Width | 490 mm | 438 mm | +52 mm |
| Depth | 455 mm | 424 mm | +31 mm |
| Weight | 8.6 kg | 7.8 kg | +0.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ender-3 S1 Pro better than Ender 3 V2 Neo?
- Build volume13.1 L vs 12.1 L+8%
- Build height (Z)270 mm vs 250 mm+8%
Why is Ender 3 V2 Neo better than Ender-3 S1 Pro?
- Number of supported materials1 vs 33×
- Weight8.6 kg vs 7.8 kg+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | — | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 220 mm | 220 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 220 mm | 220 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 270 mm | 250 mm |
| Build volume | 13.1 L | 12.1 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | — | 120 mm/s |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | — | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | TPU | PLA, PETG, ABS |
| Number of supported materials | 1 | 3 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB, SD card | USB, SD card |
| Wi-Fi | No | No |
| Ethernet | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 490 mm | 438 mm |
| Depth | 455 mm | 424 mm |
| Height | 625 mm | 472 mm |
| Weight | 8.6 kg | 7.8 kg |
| Rated power | 350 W | — |
