- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Ender 3 V2 Neo vs X3
Creality Ender 3 V2 Neo vs Zaxe X3
What Ender 3 V2 Neo does better (0) and where X3 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
4.5Build volume5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Ender 3 V2 NeoX3
| Ender 3 V2 Neo | X3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 472 mm | 530 mm | −58 mm |
| Width | 438 mm | 410 mm | +28 mm |
| Depth | 424 mm | 583 mm | −159 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ender 3 V2 Neo better than X3?
Ender 3 V2 Neo has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is X3 better than Ender 3 V2 Neo?
- Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)No · Ender 3 V2 Neo: Yes
- Wi-FiNo · Ender 3 V2 Neo: Yes
- Build volume12.1 L vs 12.7 L+5%
- EthernetNo · Ender 3 V2 Neo: Yes
- Number of supported materials3 vs 5+67%
- Build depth (Y)220 mm vs 230 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | — |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 220 mm | 220 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 220 mm | 230 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 250 mm | 250 mm |
| Build volume | 12.1 L | 12.7 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 120 mm/s | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | — |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, PETG, ABS | PLA, ABS, PETG, Nylon, Wood |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | 5 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | Yes |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB, SD card | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 438 mm | 410 mm |
| Depth | 424 mm | 583 mm |
| Height | 472 mm | 530 mm |
| Weight | 7.8 kg | — |
