- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- 3DP-GEMMA vs Sketch Sprint
Gembird 3DP-GEMMA vs MakerBot Sketch Sprint
What 3DP-GEMMA does better (2) and where Sketch Sprint wins (5) — every spec side by side.
2.2Build volume3.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
3DP-GEMMASketch Sprint
| 3DP-GEMMA | Sketch Sprint | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 290 mm | 466 mm | −176 mm |
| Width | 210 mm | 452 mm | −242 mm |
| Depth | 210 mm | 400 mm | −190 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 16 kg | −13 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 3DP-GEMMA better than Sketch Sprint?
- Finest layer height0.1 mm vs 0.2 mm2×
- Weight3 kg vs 16 kg5.3×
Why is Sketch Sprint better than 3DP-GEMMA?
- Build volume1.3 L vs 10.6 L8.2×
- Build height (Z)100 mm vs 220 mm2.2×
- Wi-FiNo · 3DP-GEMMA: Yes
- Build depth (Y)110 mm vs 220 mm2×
- Build width (X)120 mm vs 220 mm+83%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 120 mm | 220 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 110 mm | 220 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 100 mm | 220 mm |
| Build volume | 1.3 L | 10.6 L |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.1 mm | 0.2 mm |
| Thickest layer height | — | 0.2 mm |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | — | 0.4 mm |
| Swappable nozzle / hotend | — | Yes |
| Toolheads | — | 1 |
| Nozzles | — | 1 |
| Filament diameter | — | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA | PLA |
| Number of supported materials | 1 | 1 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | — | Yes |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB, SD card | Wi-Fi, USB |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 210 mm | 452 mm |
| Depth | 210 mm | 400 mm |
| Height | 290 mm | 466 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 16 kg |
