How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. Stellar 2 vs Hunter S

Emake3D Stellar 2 vs Flashforge Hunter S

What Stellar 2 does better (4) and where Hunter S wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Emake3D Stellar 2
Emake3D · 2024Stellar 2
8.3Score
4 advantages≈ $4,000
Higher score
vs
Flashforge Hunter S
Flashforge · 2023Hunter S
4.7Score
0 advantages
9.1Build volume3.4
8.5Ease of use7.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Stellar 2Hunter S
490 × 1,645.5438.5360 × 560320
Stellar 2Hunter SDifference
Height1,645.5 mm560 mm+1,085.5 mm
Width490 mm360 mm+130 mm
Depth438.5 mm320 mm+118.5 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Stellar 2 better than Hunter S?

  1. Build volume26.6 L vs 2.1 L12.7×
  2. Build height (Z)380 mm vs 180 mm2.1×
  3. Build width (X)353 mm vs 144 mm2.5×
  4. Build depth (Y)198 mm vs 81 mm2.4×

Why is Hunter S better than Stellar 2?

Hunter S has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Emake3D Stellar 2Emake3D Stellar 2≈ $4,0008.3
General
TechnologyMSLA (LCD resin)DLP (resin)
Build volume
Build width (X)353 mm144 mm
Build depth (Y)198 mm81 mm
Build height (Z)380 mm180 mm
Build volume26.6 L2.1 L
Speed
Resin print speed90 mm/h—
Print quality
Finest layer height0.025 mm—
Thickest layer height0.1 mm—
Enclosure
Max chamber temperature40 °C—
Resin & LCD
LCD resolution class8K—
LCD size16″—
XY resolution46 µm—
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityWi-Fi, Ethernet, USBWi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
Wi-FiYesYes
EthernetYesYes
USBYesYes
SD card—No
Bluetooth—No
Screen size5″—
TouchscreenYesYes
Size & power
Width490 mm360 mm
Depth438 mm320 mm
Height1,646 mm560 mm
Weight95 kg—
Rated power250 W—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare