How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. Photon Mono 4 vs Hunter S

Anycubic Photon Mono 4 vs Flashforge Hunter S

What Photon Mono 4 does better (3) and where Hunter S wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Anycubic Photon Mono 4
Anycubic · 2024Photon Mono 4
4.4Score
3 advantages≈ $150
vs
Flashforge Hunter S
Flashforge · 2023Hunter S
4.7Score
4 advantages
Higher score
3.7Build volume3.4
2.1Ease of use7.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Photon Mono 4Hunter S
230 × 391235360 × 560320
Photon Mono 4Hunter SDifference
Height391 mm560 mm−169 mm
Width230 mm360 mm−130 mm
Depth235 mm320 mm−85 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Photon Mono 4 better than Hunter S?

  1. Build volume2.2 L vs 2.1 L+5%
  2. Build depth (Y)87 mm vs 81 mm+7%
  3. Build width (X)153 mm vs 144 mm+7%

Why is Hunter S better than Photon Mono 4?

  1. Wi-FiNo · Photon Mono 4: Yes
  2. EthernetNo · Photon Mono 4: Yes
  3. TouchscreenNo · Photon Mono 4: Yes
  4. Build height (Z)165 mm vs 180 mm+9%
Specifications

Side by side

General
TechnologyMSLA (LCD resin)DLP (resin)
Delivered asFully assembled—
Build volume
Build width (X)153 mm144 mm
Build depth (Y)87 mm81 mm
Build height (Z)165 mm180 mm
Build volume2.2 L2.1 L
Speed
Resin print speed70 mm/h—
Print quality
Finest layer height0.03 mm—
Thickest layer height0.15 mm—
Automatic bed levellingNo—
Enclosure
Enclosed build chamberYes—
Resin & LCD
LCD resolution class9K—
LCD resolution (px)9024 × 5120—
LCD size7″—
XY resolution17 µm—
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityUSBWi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
Wi-FiNoYes
EthernetNoYes
USBYesYes
SD cardNoNo
BluetoothNoNo
Screen size2.8″—
TouchscreenNoYes
Features
Built-in cameraNo—
Size & power
Width230 mm360 mm
Depth235 mm320 mm
Height391 mm560 mm
Weight4 kg—
Rated power54 W—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare