How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. Photon Mono 4 Ultra vs Hunter S

Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra vs Flashforge Hunter S

What Photon Mono 4 Ultra does better (3) and where Hunter S wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra
Anycubic · 2024Photon Mono 4 Ultra
5.2Score
3 advantages≈ $270
Higher score
vs
Flashforge Hunter S
Flashforge · 2023Hunter S
4.7Score
1 advantage
3.7Build volume3.4
3.8Ease of use7.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Photon Mono 4 UltraHunter S
231 × 430236360 × 560320
Photon Mono 4 UltraHunter SDifference
Height430 mm560 mm−130 mm
Width231 mm360 mm−129 mm
Depth236 mm320 mm−84 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Photon Mono 4 Ultra better than Hunter S?

  1. Build volume2.2 L vs 2.1 L+5%
  2. Build depth (Y)87 mm vs 81 mm+7%
  3. Build width (X)153 mm vs 144 mm+7%

Why is Hunter S better than Photon Mono 4 Ultra?

  1. Build height (Z)165 mm vs 180 mm+9%
Specifications

Side by side

General
TechnologyMSLA (LCD resin)DLP (resin)
Delivered asFully assembled—
Build volume
Build width (X)153 mm144 mm
Build depth (Y)87 mm81 mm
Build height (Z)165 mm180 mm
Build volume2.2 L2.1 L
Speed
Resin print speed120 mm/h—
Print quality
Finest layer height0.02 mm—
Thickest layer height0.15 mm—
Automatic bed levellingNo—
Enclosure
Enclosed build chamberYes—
Resin & LCD
LCD resolution class9K—
LCD resolution (px)9024 × 5120—
LCD size7″—
XY resolution17 µm—
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityWi-Fi, Ethernet, USBWi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
Wi-FiYesYes
EthernetYesYes
USBYesYes
SD cardNoNo
BluetoothNoNo
App controlYes—
Screen size4.3″—
TouchscreenYesYes
Features
Built-in cameraNo—
Size & power
Width231 mm360 mm
Depth236 mm320 mm
Height430 mm560 mm
Weight5 kg—
Rated power66 W—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare