How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. 3D DigiLab 3D45 vs 2.0 F250

Dremel 3D DigiLab 3D45 vs Snapmaker 2.0 F250

What 3D DigiLab 3D45 does better (1) and where 2.0 F250 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Dremel 3D DigiLab 3D45
Dremel · 20183D DigiLab 3D45
1 advantage≈ $1,100
vs
Snapmaker 2.0 F250
Snapmaker · 20212.0 F250
4.6Score
3 advantages≈ $1,350
Higher score
2.8Build volume4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

3D DigiLab 3D452.0 F250
515 × 406394405 × 490424
3D DigiLab 3D452.0 F250Difference
Height406 mm490 mm−84 mm
Width515 mm405 mm+110 mm
Depth394 mm424 mm−30 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 3D DigiLab 3D45 better than 2.0 F250?

  1. Build width (X)255 mm vs 230 mm+11%

Why is 2.0 F250 better than 3D DigiLab 3D45?

  1. Build volume6.7 L vs 13.5 L2×
  2. Build height (Z)170 mm vs 235 mm+38%
  3. Build depth (Y)155 mm vs 250 mm+61%
Specifications

Side by side

Snapmaker 2.0 F250Snapmaker 2.0 F250≈ $1,3504.6
General
TechnologyFDM / FFF (filament)FDM / FFF (filament)
Delivered as—Kit
Build volume
Build width (X)255 mm230 mm
Build depth (Y)155 mm250 mm
Build height (Z)170 mm235 mm
Build volume6.7 L13.5 L
Speed
Max print speed—100 mm/s
Print quality
Finest layer height0.05 mm0.05 mm
Thickest layer height0.1 mm0.3 mm
Extruder & hotend
Max nozzle temperature—275 °C
Direct-drive extruder—Yes
Default nozzle—0.4 mm
Toolheads11
Nozzles11
Filament diameter1.75 mm1.75 mm
Supported materials—ABS, PETG, PLA, TPU
Number of supported materials—4
Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)—No
Print bed
Heated bedYesYes
Max bed temperature—80 °C
Enclosure
Enclosed build chamber—No
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityWi-Fi, Ethernet, USB, SD cardWi-Fi, USB
Wi-FiYesYes
EthernetYes—
USBYesYes
SD cardYes—
Screen size—5″
Touchscreen—Yes
Features
Built-in camera—No
Size & power
Width515 mm405 mm
Depth394 mm424 mm
Height406 mm490 mm
Weight19.4 kg—
Rated power—320 W
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare