- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Ender 3 V2 Neo vs X5
Creality Ender 3 V2 Neo vs Tiertime X5
What Ender 3 V2 Neo does better (4) and where X5 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.5Speed5.3
4.1Build volume3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Ender 3 V2 NeoX5
| Ender 3 V2 Neo | X5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 472 mm | 520 mm | −48 mm |
| Width | 438 mm | 850 mm | −412 mm |
| Depth | 424 mm | 625 mm | −201 mm |
| Weight | 7.8 kg | 52 kg | −44.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ender 3 V2 Neo better than X5?
- Build volume12.1 L vs 8.3 L+46%
- Weight7.8 kg vs 52 kg6.7×
- Build height (Z)250 mm vs 200 mm+25%
- Build width (X)220 mm vs 180 mm+22%
Why is X5 better than Ender 3 V2 Neo?
- Max print speed120 mm/s vs 200 mm/s+67%
- Wi-FiNo · Ender 3 V2 Neo: Yes
- EthernetNo · Ender 3 V2 Neo: Yes
- Build depth (Y)220 mm vs 230 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Delivered as | — | Fully assembled |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 220 mm | 180 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 220 mm | 230 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 250 mm | 200 mm |
| Build volume | 12.1 L | 8.3 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 120 mm/s | 200 mm/s |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | — | 0.05 mm |
| Thickest layer height | — | 0.4 mm |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | — | 299 °C |
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.5 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, PETG, ABS | — |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | — |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB, SD card | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | No | — |
| Screen size | — | 7″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 438 mm | 850 mm |
| Depth | 424 mm | 625 mm |
| Height | 472 mm | 520 mm |
| Weight | 7.8 kg | 52 kg |
