- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Ender 3 V2 Neo vs MetalFuse Forge1
Creality Ender 3 V2 Neo vs Raise3D MetalFuse Forge1
What Ender 3 V2 Neo does better (1) and where MetalFuse Forge1 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.7Speed4.1
4.5Build volume8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Ender 3 V2 NeoMetalFuse Forge1
| Ender 3 V2 Neo | MetalFuse Forge1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 472 mm | 1,390 mm | −918 mm |
| Width | 438 mm | 620 mm | −182 mm |
| Depth | 424 mm | 626 mm | −202 mm |
| Weight | 7.8 kg | 80.6 kg | −72.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ender 3 V2 Neo better than MetalFuse Forge1?
- Weight7.8 kg vs 80.6 kg10.3×
Why is MetalFuse Forge1 better than Ender 3 V2 Neo?
- Build volume12.1 L vs 27 L2.2×
- Wi-FiNo · Ender 3 V2 Neo: Yes
- Max print speed120 mm/s vs 150 mm/s+25%
- EthernetNo · Ender 3 V2 Neo: Yes
- Build height (Z)250 mm vs 300 mm+20%
- Build width (X)220 mm vs 300 mm+36%
- Build depth (Y)220 mm vs 300 mm+36%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 220 mm | 300 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 220 mm | 300 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 250 mm | 300 mm |
| Build volume | 12.1 L | 27 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 120 mm/s | 150 mm/s |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, PETG, ABS | — |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | — |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB, SD card | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 438 mm | 620 mm |
| Depth | 424 mm | 626 mm |
| Height | 472 mm | 1,390 mm |
| Weight | 7.8 kg | 80.6 kg |
