- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Ender 3 V2 Neo vs MK4
Creality Ender 3 V2 Neo vs Prusa MK4
What Ender 3 V2 Neo does better (4) and where MK4 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
4.5Build volume4.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Ender 3 V2 NeoMK4
| Ender 3 V2 Neo | MK4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 472 mm | 400 mm | +72 mm |
| Width | 438 mm | 500 mm | −62 mm |
| Depth | 424 mm | 550 mm | −126 mm |
| Weight | 7.8 kg | 7 kg | +0.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ender 3 V2 Neo better than MK4?
- Build volume12.1 L vs 11.6 L+4%
- TouchscreenYes · MK4: No
- Build height (Z)250 mm vs 220 mm+14%
- Build depth (Y)220 mm vs 210 mm+5%
Why is MK4 better than Ender 3 V2 Neo?
- Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)No · Ender 3 V2 Neo: Yes
- Number of supported materials3 vs 62×
- EthernetNo · Ender 3 V2 Neo: Yes
- Build width (X)220 mm vs 250 mm+14%
- Weight7.8 kg vs 7 kg+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | — |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 220 mm | 250 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 220 mm | 210 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 250 mm | 220 mm |
| Build volume | 12.1 L | 11.6 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 120 mm/s | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, PETG, ABS | PETG, PVA, ASA, PLA, Nylon, ABS |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | 6 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | Yes |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB, SD card | Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | No | No |
| Ethernet | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 438 mm | 500 mm |
| Depth | 424 mm | 550 mm |
| Height | 472 mm | 400 mm |
| Weight | 7.8 kg | 7 kg |
