How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare310 models · updated Nov 13, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. T-REX vs X-SMART 3

Bresser T-REX vs QIDI X-SMART 3

What T-REX does better (1) and where X-SMART 3 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Bresser T-REX
Bresser · 2021T-REX
1 advantage≈ $860
vs
QIDI X-SMART 3
QIDI · 2023X-SMART 3
5.6Score
5 advantages≈ $420
Higher score
2.6Build volume2.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-REXX-SMART 3
560 × 500415370 × 397362
T-REXX-SMART 3Difference
Height500 mm397 mm+103 mm
Width560 mm370 mm+190 mm
Depth415 mm362 mm+53 mm
Weight14.8 kg10.5 kg+4.3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-REX better than X-SMART 3?

  1. Build width (X)227 mm vs 180 mm+26%

Why is X-SMART 3 better than T-REX?

  1. Build volume5 L vs 5.5 L+10%
  2. Number of supported materials2 vs 63×
  3. Build height (Z)150 mm vs 170 mm+13%
  4. Weight14.8 kg vs 10.5 kg+41%
  5. Build depth (Y)148 mm vs 180 mm+22%
Specifications

Side by side

QIDI X-SMART 3QIDI X-SMART 3≈ $4205.6
General
TechnologyFDM / FFF (filament)FDM / FFF (filament)
Klipper firmware—Yes
Build volume
Build width (X)227 mm180 mm
Build depth (Y)148 mm180 mm
Build height (Z)150 mm170 mm
Build volume5 L5.5 L
Speed
Max print speed—500 mm/s
Max volumetric flow—30 mm³/s
Print quality
Automatic bed levelling—Yes
Extruder & hotend
Max nozzle temperature—280 °C
Default nozzle0.4 mm0.4 mm
Supported nozzle sizes (mm)—0.4, 0.8
Filament diameter1.75 mm1.75 mm
Supported materialsPLA, ABSPLA, ABS, ASA, PETG, TPU, etc.
Number of supported materials26
Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)NoNo
Print bed
Heated bedYesYes
Max bed temperature—120 °C
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityWi-Fi, USB, SD cardWi-Fi, USB
Wi-FiYesYes
EthernetNo—
USBYesYes
SD cardYes—
BluetoothNo—
Screen size—4.3″
TouchscreenYesYes
Size & power
Width560 mm370 mm
Depth415 mm362 mm
Height500 mm397 mm
Weight14.8 kg10.5 kg
Rated power—350 W
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare