- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- T-REX vs MK4
Bresser T-REX vs Prusa MK4
What T-REX does better (2) and where MK4 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
T-REXMK4
| T-REX | MK4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 500 mm | 400 mm | +100 mm |
| Width | 560 mm | 500 mm | +60 mm |
| Depth | 415 mm | 550 mm | −135 mm |
| Weight | 14.8 kg | 7 kg | +7.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is T-REX better than MK4?
- Wi-FiYes · MK4: No
- TouchscreenYes · MK4: No
Why is MK4 better than T-REX?
- Build volume5 L vs 11.6 L2.3×
- Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)No · T-REX: Yes
- Build height (Z)150 mm vs 220 mm+47%
- Number of supported materials2 vs 63×
- Weight14.8 kg vs 7 kg2.1×
- EthernetNo · T-REX: Yes
- Build depth (Y)148 mm vs 210 mm+42%
- Build width (X)227 mm vs 250 mm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | — |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 227 mm | 250 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 148 mm | 210 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 150 mm | 220 mm |
| Build volume | 5 L | 11.6 L |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS | PETG, PVA, ASA, PLA, Nylon, ABS |
| Number of supported materials | 2 | 6 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | Yes |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB, SD card | Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Ethernet | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 560 mm | 500 mm |
| Depth | 415 mm | 550 mm |
| Height | 500 mm | 400 mm |
| Weight | 14.8 kg | 7 kg |
