- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- T-REX vs HP3DX200E
Bresser T-REX vs Hamlet HP3DX200E
What T-REX does better (2) and where HP3DX200E wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is T-REX better than HP3DX200E?
- Wi-FiYes · HP3DX200E: No
- TouchscreenYes · HP3DX200E: No
Why is HP3DX200E better than T-REX?
- Number of supported materials2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 227 mm | — |
| Build depth (Y) | 148 mm | — |
| Build height (Z) | 150 mm | — |
| Build volume | 5 L | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | — |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | — |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS | PETG, ABS, PLA |
| Number of supported materials | 2 | 3 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB, SD card | SD card |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Ethernet | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| SD card | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 560 mm | — |
| Depth | 415 mm | — |
| Height | 500 mm | — |
| Weight | 14.8 kg | — |
