- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- T-REX vs WLAN
Bresser T-REX vs Bresser WLAN
What T-REX does better (2) and where WLAN wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
T-REXWLAN
| T-REX | WLAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 500 mm | 405 mm | +95 mm |
| Width | 560 mm | 380 mm | +180 mm |
| Depth | 415 mm | 400 mm | +15 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is T-REX better than WLAN?
- Build volume5 L vs 3.4 L+47%
- Build width (X)227 mm vs 150 mm+51%
Why is WLAN better than T-REX?
- EthernetNo · T-REX: Yes
- Number of supported materials2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | — |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 227 mm | 150 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 148 mm | 150 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 150 mm | 150 mm |
| Build volume | 5 L | 3.4 L |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS | ABS, PLA, Wood |
| Number of supported materials | 2 | 3 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB, SD card | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 560 mm | 380 mm |
| Depth | 415 mm | 400 mm |
| Height | 500 mm | 405 mm |
| Weight | 14.8 kg | — |
