How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare310 models · updated Nov 14, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. i3 MK3S vs 2.0 F250

Prusa i3 MK3S vs Snapmaker 2.0 F250

What i3 MK3S does better (1) and where 2.0 F250 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Prusa i3 MK3S
Prusa · 2019i3 MK3S
1 advantage≈ $970
vs
Snapmaker 2.0 F250
Snapmaker · 20212.0 F250
4.8Score
4 advantages≈ $1,350
Higher score
3.7Build volume5.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

i3 MK3S2.0 F250
550 × 500400405 × 490424
i3 MK3S2.0 F250Difference
Height500 mm490 mm+10 mm
Width550 mm405 mm+145 mm
Depth400 mm424 mm−24 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is i3 MK3S better than 2.0 F250?

  1. Build width (X)250 mm vs 230 mm+9%

Why is 2.0 F250 better than i3 MK3S?

  1. Build volume11 L vs 13.5 L+23%
  2. Wi-FiNo · i3 MK3S: Yes
  3. Build height (Z)210 mm vs 235 mm+12%
  4. Build depth (Y)210 mm vs 250 mm+19%
Specifications

Side by side

Snapmaker 2.0 F250Snapmaker 2.0 F250≈ $1,3504.8
General
TechnologyFDM / FFF (filament)FDM / FFF (filament)
Delivered asKitKit
Build volume
Build width (X)250 mm230 mm
Build depth (Y)210 mm250 mm
Build height (Z)210 mm235 mm
Build volume11 L13.5 L
Speed
Max print speed—100 mm/s
Print quality
Finest layer height—0.05 mm
Thickest layer height—0.3 mm
Extruder & hotend
Max nozzle temperature—275 °C
Direct-drive extruder—Yes
Default nozzle0.4 mm0.4 mm
Toolheads—1
Nozzles—1
Filament diameter1.75 mm1.75 mm
Supported materials—ABS, PETG, PLA, TPU
Number of supported materials—4
Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)—No
Print bed
Heated bed—Yes
Max bed temperature—80 °C
Enclosure
Enclosed build chamber—No
Connectivity & control
ConnectivitySD cardWi-Fi, USB
Wi-FiNoYes
EthernetNo—
USBNoYes
SD cardYes—
BluetoothNo—
Screen size—5″
Touchscreen—Yes
Features
Built-in camera—No
Size & power
Width550 mm405 mm
Depth400 mm424 mm
Height500 mm490 mm
Weight11 kg—
Rated power—320 W
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare