- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Sketch Sprint vs X3
MakerBot Sketch Sprint vs Zaxe X3
What Sketch Sprint does better (0) and where X3 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Build volume5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Sketch SprintX3
| Sketch Sprint | X3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 466 mm | 530 mm | −64 mm |
| Width | 452 mm | 410 mm | +42 mm |
| Depth | 400 mm | 583 mm | −183 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Sketch Sprint better than X3?
Sketch Sprint has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is X3 better than Sketch Sprint?
- Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)No · Sketch Sprint: Yes
- Build volume10.6 L vs 12.7 L+20%
- Number of supported materials1 vs 55×
- EthernetNo · Sketch Sprint: Yes
- Build height (Z)220 mm vs 250 mm+14%
- Build depth (Y)220 mm vs 230 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | — |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 220 mm | 220 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 220 mm | 230 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 220 mm | 250 mm |
| Build volume | 10.6 L | 12.7 L |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.2 mm | — |
| Thickest layer height | 0.2 mm | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | — |
| Swappable nozzle / hotend | Yes | — |
| Toolheads | 1 | — |
| Nozzles | 1 | — |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA | PLA, ABS, PETG, Nylon, Wood |
| Number of supported materials | 1 | 5 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | Yes |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 452 mm | 410 mm |
| Depth | 400 mm | 583 mm |
| Height | 466 mm | 530 mm |
| Weight | 16 kg | — |
