- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- A6 vs A8S
JGAURORA A6 vs JGAURORA A8S
What A6 does better (1) and where A8S wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
A6A8S
| A6 | A8S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 472 mm | 720 mm | −248 mm |
| Width | 520 mm | 740 mm | −220 mm |
| Depth | 405 mm | 560 mm | −155 mm |
| Weight | 21 kg | 32 kg | −11 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A6 better than A8S?
- Weight21 kg vs 32 kg+52%
Why is A8S better than A6?
- Build volume12 L vs 26.2 L2.2×
- Build height (Z)200 mm vs 300 mm+50%
- Max nozzle temperature250 °C vs 260 °C+4%
- Number of supported materials3 vs 4+33%
- Build depth (Y)200 mm vs 250 mm+25%
- Build width (X)300 mm vs 350 mm+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Delivered as | Fully assembled | Fully assembled |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 300 mm | 350 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 200 mm | 250 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 200 mm | 300 mm |
| Build volume | 12 L | 26.2 L |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.05 mm | 0.05 mm |
| Thickest layer height | 0.3 mm | 0.3 mm |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | 250 °C | 260 °C |
| Default nozzle | 0.4 mm | 0.4 mm |
| Filament diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS, TPU | ABS, PLA, TPU, etc |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | 4 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | Yes |
| Max bed temperature | 110 °C | 110 °C |
| Enclosure | ||
| Enclosed build chamber | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB, SD card | USB, SD card |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | Yes |
| Screen size | 4.3″ | 4.3″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 520 mm | 740 mm |
| Depth | 405 mm | 560 mm |
| Height | 472 mm | 720 mm |
| Weight | 21 kg | 32 kg |
