- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- HP3DX200E vs X-PLUS 3
Hamlet HP3DX200E vs QIDI X-PLUS 3
What HP3DX200E does better (0) and where X-PLUS 3 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is HP3DX200E better than X-PLUS 3?
HP3DX200E has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is X-PLUS 3 better than HP3DX200E?
- Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)No · HP3DX200E: Yes
- Wi-FiNo · HP3DX200E: Yes
- Number of supported materials3 vs 144.7×
- EthernetNo · HP3DX200E: Yes
- TouchscreenNo · HP3DX200E: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Klipper firmware | — | Yes |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | — | 280 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | — | 280 mm |
| Build height (Z) | — | 270 mm |
| Build volume | — | 21.2 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | — | 600 mm/s |
| Max volumetric flow | — | 35 mm³/s |
| Print quality | ||
| Automatic bed levelling | — | Yes |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | — | 350 °C |
| Default nozzle | — | 0.4 mm |
| Supported nozzle sizes (mm) | — | 0.4, 0.8 |
| Nozzle material | — | hardened steel |
| Filament diameter | — | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PETG, ABS, PLA | PET-CF, PA12-CF, compatible: PLA, ABS, TPU, ASA, PETG, PET-CF, PA12-CF, PC, UltraPA, Nylon, Carbon Fiber, etc. |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | 14 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | Yes |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | — | Yes |
| Max bed temperature | — | 120 °C |
| Enclosure | ||
| Actively heated chamber | — | Yes |
| Max chamber temperature | — | 65 °C |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | SD card | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | No | Yes |
| USB | No | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | No | — |
| Screen size | — | 5″ |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | Yes | — |
| Filament runout sensor | — | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 511 mm |
| Depth | — | 527 mm |
| Height | — | 529 mm |
| Weight | — | 19.5 kg |
| Rated power | — | 800 W |
