- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- HP3DX200E vs Arco
Hamlet HP3DX200E vs Phrozen Arco
What HP3DX200E does better (0) and where Arco wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is HP3DX200E better than Arco?
HP3DX200E has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Arco better than HP3DX200E?
- Wi-FiNo · HP3DX200E: Yes
- Number of supported materials3 vs 72.3×
- TouchscreenNo · HP3DX200E: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Klipper firmware | — | Yes |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | — | 300 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | — | 300 mm |
| Build height (Z) | — | 300 mm |
| Build volume | — | 27 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | — | 1,000 mm/s |
| Max acceleration | — | 40,000 mm/s² |
| Max volumetric flow | — | 50 mm³/s |
| Print quality | ||
| Automatic bed levelling | — | Yes |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | — | 300 °C |
| Supported materials | PETG, ABS, PLA | PLA, ABS, ASA, PETG, TPU, PET CF15, etc. |
| Number of supported materials | 3 | 7 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | — | Yes |
| Max bed temperature | — | 120 °C |
| Enclosure | ||
| Enclosed build chamber | — | No |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | SD card | Wi-Fi, USB |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | No | — |
| USB | No | Yes |
| SD card | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | No | — |
| Screen size | — | 5″ |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | Yes | Yes |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | — | 491 mm |
| Depth | — | 475 mm |
| Height | — | 620 mm |
| Weight | — | 22 kg |
| Rated power | — | 1,700 W |
