- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Arco vs ZR
Phrozen Arco vs WonderMaker ZR
What Arco does better (2) and where ZR wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
ArcoZR
| Arco | ZR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 620 mm | 520 mm | +100 mm |
| Width | 491 mm | 450 mm | +41 mm |
| Depth | 475 mm | 450 mm | +25 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Arco better than ZR?
- Max print speed1,000 mm/s vs 300 mm/s3.3×
- Number of supported materials7 vs 4+75%
Why is ZR better than Arco?
ZR has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | FDM / FFF (filament) | FDM / FFF (filament) |
| Klipper firmware | Yes | — |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Build volume | 27 L | 27 L |
| Speed | ||
| Max print speed | 1,000 mm/s | 300 mm/s |
| Max acceleration | 40,000 mm/s² | — |
| Max volumetric flow | 50 mm³/s | — |
| Print quality | ||
| Automatic bed levelling | Yes | — |
| Extruder & hotend | ||
| Max nozzle temperature | 300 °C | 300 °C |
| Filament diameter | — | 1.75 mm |
| Supported materials | PLA, ABS, ASA, PETG, TPU, PET CF15, etc. | PVA, PETG, PLA, TPU |
| Number of supported materials | 7 | 4 |
| Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF) | No | No |
| Print bed | ||
| Heated bed | Yes | Yes |
| Max bed temperature | 120 °C | — |
| Enclosure | ||
| Enclosed build chamber | No | — |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, USB | Wi-Fi |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| SD card | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | No |
| Screen size | 5″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | Yes | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 491 mm | 450 mm |
| Depth | 475 mm | 450 mm |
| Height | 620 mm | 520 mm |
| Weight | 22 kg | — |
| Rated power | 1,700 W | — |
