How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. Guider 3 vs 2.0 Modular F350

Flashforge Guider 3 vs Snapmaker 2.0 Modular F350

What Guider 3 does better (2) and where 2.0 Modular F350 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Flashforge Guider 3
Flashforge · 2022Guider 3
9.0Score
2 advantages≈ $2,000
Higher score
vs
Snapmaker 2.0 Modular F350
Snapmaker · 20212.0 Modular F350
3 advantages≈ $1,650
8.3Build volume9.3

Why is Guider 3 better than 2.0 Modular F350?

  1. EthernetYes · 2.0 Modular F350: No
  2. Build height (Z)340 mm vs 330 mm+3%

Why is 2.0 Modular F350 better than Guider 3?

  1. Build volume25.5 L vs 37 L+45%
  2. Build depth (Y)250 mm vs 350 mm+40%
  3. Build width (X)300 mm vs 320 mm+7%
Specifications

Side by side

Flashforge Guider 3Flashforge Guider 3≈ $2,0009.0
General
TechnologyFDM / FFF (filament)—
Build volume
Build width (X)300 mm320 mm
Build depth (Y)250 mm350 mm
Build height (Z)340 mm330 mm
Build volume25.5 L37 L
Speed
Max print speed250 mm/s—
Print quality
Finest layer height0.05 mm—
Thickest layer height0.4 mm—
Automatic bed levellingYes—
Extruder & hotend
Max nozzle temperature320 °C—
Default nozzle0.4 mm0.4 mm
Supported nozzle sizes (mm)0.4, 0.8—
Supported materialsABS, PLA, PC, PA, HIPS, ASA, PETG, PA-CF, PLA-CF, PETG-CF, PETG-GF—
Number of supported materials11—
Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)Yes—
Print bed
Heated bedYes—
Max bed temperature110 °C—
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityWi-Fi, Ethernet, USBWi-Fi, USB
Wi-FiYesYes
EthernetYesNo
USBYesYes
SD card—No
Bluetooth—No
App controlYes—
Screen size4.3″—
TouchscreenYesYes
Features
Filament runout sensorYes—
Size & power
Width496 mm—
Depth436 mm—
Height696 mm—
Weight27 kg—
Rated power—320 W
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare