How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. Stellar III vs Hunter S

Emake3D Stellar III vs Flashforge Hunter S

What Stellar III does better (2) and where Hunter S wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Emake3D Stellar III
Emake3D · 2025Stellar III
3.6Score
2 advantages≈ $8,000
vs
Flashforge Hunter S
Flashforge · 2023Hunter S
4.7Score
2 advantages
Higher score
2.1Build volume3.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Stellar IIIHunter S
505 × 1,290760360 × 560320
Stellar IIIHunter SDifference
Height1,290 mm560 mm+730 mm
Width505 mm360 mm+145 mm
Depth760 mm320 mm+440 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Stellar III better than Hunter S?

  1. Build width (X)211 mm vs 144 mm+47%
  2. Build depth (Y)118 mm vs 81 mm+46%

Why is Hunter S better than Stellar III?

  1. Build volume0.9 L vs 2.1 L2.3×
  2. Build height (Z)35 mm vs 180 mm5.1×
Specifications

Side by side

Emake3D Stellar IIIEmake3D Stellar III≈ $8,0003.6
General
TechnologyMSLA (LCD resin)DLP (resin)
Build volume
Build width (X)211 mm144 mm
Build depth (Y)118 mm81 mm
Build height (Z)35 mm180 mm
Build volume0.9 L2.1 L
Speed
Resin print speed30 mm/h—
Print quality
Finest layer height0.05 mm—
Thickest layer height0.1 mm—
Resin & LCD
XY resolution19 µm—
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityWi-Fi, Ethernet, USBWi-Fi, Ethernet, USB
Wi-FiYesYes
EthernetYesYes
USBYesYes
SD card—No
Bluetooth—No
Touchscreen—Yes
Size & power
Width505 mm360 mm
Depth760 mm320 mm
Height1,290 mm560 mm
Weight152 kg—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare