- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Mars 3 vs Sonic 4K 2022
Elegoo Mars 3 vs Phrozen Sonic 4K 2022
What Mars 3 does better (4) and where Sonic 4K 2022 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.6Print quality4.6
3.8Build volume3.3
2.4Ease of use8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mars 3Sonic 4K 2022
| Mars 3 | Sonic 4K 2022 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 438.5 mm | 460 mm | −21.5 mm |
| Width | 227 mm | 230 mm | −3 mm |
| Depth | 227 mm | 260 mm | −33 mm |
| Weight | 5.2 kg | 14.9 kg | −9.7 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mars 3 better than Sonic 4K 2022?
- Build volume2.3 L vs 2 L+15%
- Weight5.2 kg vs 14.9 kg2.9×
- Build depth (Y)90 mm vs 75 mm+20%
- Build width (X)143 mm vs 135 mm+6%
Why is Sonic 4K 2022 better than Mars 3?
- Wi-FiNo · Mars 3: Yes
- EthernetNo · Mars 3: Yes
- Build height (Z)175 mm vs 200 mm+14%
- Screen size3.5″ vs 5″+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | MSLA (LCD resin) | MSLA (LCD resin) |
| Delivered as | Fully assembled | — |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 143 mm | 135 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 90 mm | 75 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 175 mm | 200 mm |
| Build volume | 2.3 L | 2 L |
| Speed | ||
| Resin print speed | 50 mm/h | — |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.01 mm | 0.01 mm |
| Thickest layer height | 0.2 mm | — |
| Enclosure | ||
| Enclosed build chamber | Yes | — |
| Resin & LCD | ||
| LCD resolution class | 4K | 4K |
| LCD resolution (px) | 4098 × 2560 | — |
| LCD size | 6.6″ | — |
| XY resolution | 35 µm | 35 µm |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, USB |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | No | — |
| Bluetooth | No | — |
| Screen size | 3.5″ | 5″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | — |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 227 mm | 230 mm |
| Depth | 227 mm | 260 mm |
| Height | 438 mm | 460 mm |
| Weight | 5.2 kg | 14.9 kg |
| Rated power | 60 W | — |
