- scrc.us.com
- Compare
- Mars 3 vs Foto 8.9
Elegoo Mars 3 vs Flashforge Foto 8.9
What Mars 3 does better (3) and where Foto 8.9 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mars 3Foto 8.9
| Mars 3 | Foto 8.9 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 438.5 mm | 465 mm | −26.5 mm |
| Width | 227 mm | 280 mm | −53 mm |
| Depth | 227 mm | 240 mm | −13 mm |
| Weight | 5.2 kg | 12.5 kg | −7.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mars 3 better than Foto 8.9?
- Finest layer height0.01 mm vs 0.03 mm3×
- XY resolution35 µm vs 50 µm+43%
- Weight5.2 kg vs 12.5 kg2.4×
Why is Foto 8.9 better than Mars 3?
- Build volume2.3 L vs 4.6 L2×
- Build height (Z)175 mm vs 200 mm+14%
- LCD size6.6″ vs 8.9″+35%
- Build width (X)143 mm vs 192 mm+34%
- Build depth (Y)90 mm vs 120 mm+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| General | ||
| Technology | MSLA (LCD resin) | MSLA (LCD resin) |
| Delivered as | Fully assembled | Fully assembled |
| Build volume | ||
| Build width (X) | 143 mm | 192 mm |
| Build depth (Y) | 90 mm | 120 mm |
| Build height (Z) | 175 mm | 200 mm |
| Build volume | 2.3 L | 4.6 L |
| Speed | ||
| Resin print speed | 50 mm/h | 50 mm/h |
| Print quality | ||
| Finest layer height | 0.01 mm | 0.03 mm |
| Thickest layer height | 0.2 mm | 0.2 mm |
| Enclosure | ||
| Enclosed build chamber | Yes | Yes |
| Resin & LCD | ||
| LCD resolution class | 4K | 4K |
| LCD resolution (px) | 4098 × 2560 | 3840 × 2400 |
| LCD size | 6.6″ | 8.9″ |
| XY resolution | 35 µm | 50 µm |
| Connectivity & control | ||
| Connectivity | USB | USB |
| Wi-Fi | No | — |
| Ethernet | No | — |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| SD card | No | — |
| Bluetooth | No | — |
| Screen size | 3.5″ | 3.5″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Built-in camera | No | No |
| Size & power | ||
| Width | 227 mm | 280 mm |
| Depth | 227 mm | 240 mm |
| Height | 438 mm | 465 mm |
| Weight | 5.2 kg | 12.5 kg |
| Rated power | 60 W | 120 W |
