How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. DX vs Guider IIs V2

CreatBot DX vs Flashforge Guider IIs V2

What DX does better (5) and where Guider IIs V2 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

CreatBot DX
CreatBot · 2020DX
8.8Score
5 advantages≈ $2,100
Higher score
vs
Flashforge Guider IIs V2
Flashforge · 2021Guider IIs V2
0 advantages≈ $1,700
8.2Build volume7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

DXGuider IIs V2
420 × 570380549 × 561490
DXGuider IIs V2Difference
Height570 mm561 mm+9 mm
Width420 mm549 mm−129 mm
Depth380 mm490 mm−110 mm
Weight25 kg30 kg−5 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is DX better than Guider IIs V2?

  1. Finest layer height0.05 mm vs 0.1 mm2×
  2. Build volume22.5 L vs 21 L+7%
  3. Number of supported materials13 vs 7+86%
  4. Weight25 kg vs 30 kg+20%
  5. Build width (X)300 mm vs 280 mm+7%

Why is Guider IIs V2 better than DX?

Guider IIs V2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

CreatBot DXCreatBot DX≈ $2,1008.8
General
TechnologyFDM / FFF (filament)FDM / FFF (filament)
Build volume
Build width (X)300 mm280 mm
Build depth (Y)250 mm250 mm
Build height (Z)300 mm300 mm
Build volume22.5 L21 L
Speed
Max print speed200 mm/s—
Print quality
Finest layer height0.05 mm0.1 mm
Thickest layer height—0.4 mm
Extruder & hotend
Max nozzle temperature350 °C—
Default nozzle0.4 mm—
Toolheads—1
Nozzles—1
Filament diameter1.75 mm1.75 mm
Supported materialsPLA, ABS, Carbon Fiber, Wood, Nylon, PC, PTEG, HIPS, PP, Flexible, TPU, PVA, etc.ABS, ASA, HIPS, PC, PET, PETG, PLA
Number of supported materials137
Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)YesYes
Print bed
Heated bedYesYes
Max bed temperature100 °C—
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityUSBWi-Fi, USB
Wi-Fi—Yes
USBYesYes
Screen size4.3″—
TouchscreenYes—
Size & power
Width420 mm549 mm
Depth380 mm490 mm
Height570 mm561 mm
Weight25 kg30 kg
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare