How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare286 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. scrc.us.com
  2. Compare
  3. Ender 3 V2 Neo vs Guider IIs V2

Creality Ender 3 V2 Neo vs Flashforge Guider IIs V2

What Ender 3 V2 Neo does better (1) and where Guider IIs V2 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Creality Ender 3 V2 Neo
Creality · 2022Ender 3 V2 Neo
3.9Score
1 advantage
Higher score
vs
Flashforge Guider IIs V2
Flashforge · 2021Guider IIs V2
7 advantages≈ $1,700
4.1Build volume7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Ender 3 V2 NeoGuider IIs V2
438 × 472424549 × 561490
Ender 3 V2 NeoGuider IIs V2Difference
Height472 mm561 mm−89 mm
Width438 mm549 mm−111 mm
Depth424 mm490 mm−66 mm
Weight7.8 kg30 kg−22.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Ender 3 V2 Neo better than Guider IIs V2?

  1. Weight7.8 kg vs 30 kg3.8×

Why is Guider IIs V2 better than Ender 3 V2 Neo?

  1. Build volume12.1 L vs 21 L+74%
  2. Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)No · Ender 3 V2 Neo: Yes
  3. Wi-FiNo · Ender 3 V2 Neo: Yes
  4. Number of supported materials3 vs 72.3×
  5. Build height (Z)250 mm vs 300 mm+20%
  6. Build width (X)220 mm vs 280 mm+27%
  7. Build depth (Y)220 mm vs 250 mm+14%
Specifications

Side by side

General
TechnologyFDM / FFF (filament)FDM / FFF (filament)
Build volume
Build width (X)220 mm280 mm
Build depth (Y)220 mm250 mm
Build height (Z)250 mm300 mm
Build volume12.1 L21 L
Speed
Max print speed120 mm/s—
Print quality
Finest layer height—0.1 mm
Thickest layer height—0.4 mm
Extruder & hotend
Default nozzle0.4 mm—
Toolheads—1
Nozzles—1
Filament diameter1.75 mm1.75 mm
Supported materialsPLA, PETG, ABSABS, ASA, HIPS, PC, PET, PETG, PLA
Number of supported materials37
Engineering materials (PA, PC, CF)NoYes
Print bed
Heated bed—Yes
Connectivity & control
ConnectivityUSB, SD cardWi-Fi, USB
Wi-FiNoYes
EthernetNo—
USBYesYes
SD cardYes—
BluetoothNo—
TouchscreenYes—
Size & power
Width438 mm549 mm
Depth424 mm490 mm
Height472 mm561 mm
Weight7.8 kg30 kg
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare